Played out via helmet cam, Hollywood-style still photos released of the Commander-In-Chief, in the Situation Room supervising the kill. For an operation that was reportedly a year in the planning, an elementary understanding of the history of the American West suggests they should have thought more carefully before they code named Bin Laden after the last hero of the Indian Wars. This post first appeared on the Channel 4 News website.
It’s what you shout when take a dangerous leap; a slogan of US paratroopers during the second world war. But the 19th century Chiricahua Apache hero, whose name it is, was a perhaps questionable choice of code name for Osama Bin Laden; given the numbers of people who do regard him as a hero. His story is laden with symbolic parallels for those who choose to regard Bin Laden as a great warrior.
Born Goyahkla (He Who Yawns) in modern New Mexico in 1829, he was given the name Geronimo by Mexican soldiers, who prayed to St Jerome, after seeing him defy bullets to attack with a knife. His desire for revenge against the Mexicans was fuelled by their massacre of his mother, wife and 3 children. He was a symbol of resistance – the man who defied the White Man’s broken treaties, who refused to remain quietly on a reservation when other tribes had given in and been forced off their tribal lands.
Geronimo, famously said he was not a chief; not a political leader. Like Bin Laden he saw himself as a military leader.
Bin Laden’s fundamental hatred against the West was supposedly the US presence on holy (and oil-rich) Saudi Arab soil. In the 1860s, the discovery of Gold in the West saw the US and the Mexican governments speed up their push against American Indians to seize their land. Geronimo became a great war leader, a symbol of resistance to the White occupation. His small band of warriors raided settlements in Arizona, and attacked US troops.
As the US looks to withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the possibility of negotiating with the Taliban, it’s worth noting that he was rarely defeated and US Generals found themselves struggling to form a successful strategy. The last of the Indian wars ended after years, only when Geronimo signed a peace treaty with General Nelson Miles – who had failed to defeat him by military means.
The end of Geronimo was a humiliation of broken promises, not assassination. As a result of the revisionist histories written since the 1960s, many younger Americans, such as President Obama, would, surely be aware of the less than honourable actions of US forces against American Indians, such as Geronimo. He and his people were moved around Florida, and Alabama, ending up in Oklahoma. He was not killed in a compound; but died in a US military base – Fort Sill in 1909 after completing his autobiography.
Even in the early 1960s, when we assume Indians were the “bad guys”, Hollywood’s first biopic starring the white sportman turned actor Chuck Connors as the Native Indian hero, saw him portrayed as a great hero and family man, abused by Federal forces.
The 1993 film Geronimo: An American Legend, starting Gene Hackman, Robert Duvall and the Native American Wes Studi as Geronimo, focussed on the abuse of the Apache themselves and the success of a small band of dedicated warriors against the might of the US military.
According to some analyses today, the US military chose the code name because Bin Laden, like Geronimo, had evaded capture for years. If they were trying to avoid mythmaking, it seems they chose the wrong code name.
On life of Geronimo.
on the choice of code name: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8489354/Osama-bin-Laden-dead-code-name-Geronimo.html